I know, shame on me for never bringing this up. Oops. And it was cut very short by Sandy-- got it up by Wednesday afternoon, & it's coming down this afternoon.
The reception was tiny (not a lot of people showed up), but nice.
I've still got to do things like crop some images before they're suitable for showing (hahahaha aren't i funny), but there's some new things that i might not have posted up on my DeviantART, if you're interested.
Part of a painting that is due tomorrow that's still not finished, & i have only a little bit of time before class tomorrow to try & get it done. It's on a piece of canvas that's about 18x72". I think 72" is the biggest i've ever gone on anything before.
Also, i will be having my very own little solo show from October 29 through November 2nd (more like the 1st). I'll give more information as time goes on-- like once the guy who's supposed to email people emails people-- like where it is & when there may possibly be a little reception. So this is just a heads up, & a suggestion to maybe not be doing anything on the night of November 1st.
I'm pretty bad at updating this, so here's a little update-let. Featuring my face from this past Saturday (with my chair-arm pillow children & my awesome free party hat), when i went with some friends (including the insanely talented Maggie) to the Small Press Expo (SPX) in Bethesda, MD. I'm pretty much out of the loop re: comics, but it was cool & i got some awesome stuff.
I listed out everything i spent money on, with pictures, here. And everyone in Bethesda outside of SPX was jealous of my party hat. How else do you explain all the glares i got while we were out getting dinner?
Before that, in college land, we got assigned to do 100 paintings (/drawings??) in one week.
I only made it to 48. (The three recognizable things are because the teacher wanted to see at least three past things that we'd done. All above that are the 48.) So here's a few of those:
The next assignment is to do an "epic" (read: large) painting based off of a story, like a myth or legend. I'm still doing thumbnails, still trying to decide between two stories, & i still need to get something big to make the thing on.
Unfortunately, i can't seem to find it through Google, so i'll
have to describe the thing from memory: a scanned image of a drawing
and writing in black on pink paper. The drawing is of a hairy leg
being shaved, and i guess it's meant to be seen as female because the
nails are put in as a detail. The writing, of which i can no longer
remember the actual phrasing, went something along the lines of how
shaving is "slightly mutilating" one's body.
There is so much wrong with this that i don't even know where to
start, except that i'm glad i haven't seen the thing in over a year.
Let's start with the language, because it's the first thing that
can strike someone has being not just problematic, but frankly
disgusting. When you remove hair, however you do it, you are
simply removing hair. You can't hurthair. Equating the removal of hair with mutilation,
specifically with self-mutilation, is thoughtless and hurtful. Do you
know what self-mutilation is? It's not hair removal. It's not even
nicking yourself when you shave. If shaving is mutilation, then
what's a hair cut? What's getting a tattoo? Piercings? All things
that people who don't shave can and still do. But seriously, this is
beyond unfortunate language use, it's plain ignorant. It's ignorant
of the truth of self-harm, of the emotions involved in it, of the
stigma surrounding it. It paradoxically plays it down by trying to
elevate shaving to a hyperbolic level. Hair removal is not self-harm.
You degrade & downplay the experiences of all self-harmers when
you trivialize them like this. Removing one's hair is not the same as
cutting, and it is outright disgusting to see someone try to claim it
And the fact of the matter is that it plays right into shaming.
It's already problematic enough that mutilation is regarded as
shameful, as "What the fuck is wrong with you?" which
doesn't help people at all, but for this supposedly feminist "don't
shave" image, it's made doubly disgusting that they should fall
back on this fact.
Which leads into more of the issues with this image. Because, at
its heart, it's not actually changing anything. It still is relying
on shame and shaming, the same as everything in society that tells
women "This is who you should be, this is how you should look."
Society relies on shaming women to get them to shave, by telling them
their hair is gross at its worst and worthy of frat-boy humor at
best. This is clearly wrong and harmful and something should be done,
yes, but this pink drawing isn't doing it. The paradigm remains the
same: it still relies on shame. It relies on the view that mutilation
is shameful, which leaves many people to suffer in silence; it relies
on the shaming of someone who decides what to do with their own body.
It relies on telling you that you are wrong if you don't do X.
It doesn't matter that now they're saying "shaving is bad; don't
shave," the message is still the same, the structure is still
It's one thing to be aware that, when one chooses to remove one's
hair, that messages from society-- and even family and friends-- play
into that decision, that there is still an element of societal shame
at work. But for some people, they make more of a choice because they
want to do this thing, the same way as someone may make the choice to
not shave. The same goes for wearing dresses, or makeup, or high
heels. Yes, there is always society's patriarchal ideas of "this
is what a woman is," but there are also those women who say, "I
want to do this thing." That doesn't make them any less of a
person, or any less of a feminist (if they are one). Hairy legs do
not a feminist make.
I was under the impression that feminism meant "I believe
that you can be who you are and that you should still be treated as a
human being and an equal, no matter what." That no matter
whether you shave or not, that you should still be treated as a
person, as an equal, with dignity.
This image is not revolutionary. All it's doing is flipping who
says what is "beautiful." It switches A for B and vice
versa. If society says "Shave your legs because your hair is
gross," this image says, "Don't shave your legs because
that's mutilation". How is that any better? Both play on shame
that has been ingrained into certain acts by our society. Now instead
of following society's idea of beauty, you're expected to
follow a new one, while putting down anyone who opts for the
former. That's not any better. It's actually really petty, when you
consider the actual issues that feminism faces, and the issues that
people have with it, such as excluding transwomen (and i'd guess many
other gender-queer/-fluid people) and women of color. But no, let's
instead fixate on telling women not to shave!
What would really be a change is actually so obvious that it
should be embarrassing that it has to be pointed out: Telling women
that whichever they choose, they can, and that it's okay. Shock! It's
fine if you want to shave! It's fine if you don't want to shave! How
hard is that to say?
These are the kind of people who go on and on about the
patriarchy, and yet fall back on the same tools used by the
patriarchy. That isn't feminism, it's internalized misogyny. To shame
other women who do shave, or wear makeup, or like the color
pink, isn't being feminist or ~*revolutionary*~, it's called being
just as sexist as anyone who would shame a woman who doesn't shave or
wear makeup. The paradigm remains the same, the terms just change.
Telling women (cis, trans*, and
everyone in between) not to shave by making the act shameful is not
the same as pointing out the issues with telling women they have
to shave, and then connecting that to the broad, overarching issues.
It's one thing to say, "Let's talk about how society shames
women into altering the natural state of their bodies and what that
can do to a person." That's something that ought to be
discussed. But not by shaming, and not by making it out that, if you
don't shave, that makes you a better person and feminist. Isn't there
enough shaming of women already? People get it from society as it is,
do they really need any more from so-called "feminists"?
So last week i went on vacation with my family, & on Tuesday i'm pretty sure i came very close to drowning. I am not an experienced swimmer (i learned late in life, & still freak out when my feet can't touch a bottom if necessary), but i went out for the second time that day, & found myself in this situation. Thankfully i said something before this group of people went to the shore, & thankfully this guy who i'd never met before helped me.
Seriously: don't go back in the ocean if you're even a little tired (which is what i did). And if you're an inexperienced swimmer, either go out with someone else who is, or be really aware of where you are & what the current may be doing. I think that i got so wrapped up in wave jumping that i didn't notice that i had been carried a little further out & north-- not too far out, but far out enough that i couldn't touch bottom. And i also wore myself out even more than i already was by swimming, both before this happened & when i realized that things weren't feeling 100% okay anymore. I stayed calm, but i wonder if any panic found its way out in my swimming, because i got tired very quickly. My legs felt like they didn't want to move anymore, & i got very winded. Which leads me to the next point: know that you can wave for a lifeguard's help. I didn't know this; i thought i would have to yell, which i couldn't do because i was winded. If i hadn't spoken up, & if i hadn't been heard, & if this guy didn't help me, i would either be drowned, or there would have been a big scene made that day on the beach.
The day after this was a bad day for swimming, so i didn't go in. On Thursday, after standing for way too long on the shore, getting mad at myself, i got back in. Twice.
Well, power's still not back, but hopefully it will be today. Then we just have to hope the forecasted storms on Sunday don't knock it right back out....
Even though i'm not going to backtrack & show everything, i figured i would at least show some art show pictures, from both the Towson University Senior Show & the group show, Flux Capacity, at Nudashank.
First, the opening night of the Senior Show.
Here's all of my work that was in the show:
The space the show took place in used to be a Kinko's, hence the name "the Kinko's Space," as least casually, if not officially.
It actually got really crowded! Meanwhile, here's Megan being silly, looking at one of my lithographs.
And one of Margaret's installations in a little closet:
If you see the work of anyone who i neglected to mention & it interests you, let me know & i can check to see if 1)i know them/remember their name (hey man, i'm bad at names), & 2)if they have a website.
(I changed my mind. I like this new layout. Uploading pictures is so much more easy & fast now!)